Denying citizenship to U.S. born children is racist

NeighborhoodKidsCROP

Some members of Congress are pushing to challenge the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which grants automatic citizenship to anyone born in the country.

Republicans that favor anti-immigrant policies are using the issue as an attempt to foster political fear-mongering in order to pander to their conservative voting base as November elections near, critics charge.

The real argument, activists say is rooted in the battle for comprehensive immigration reform with a pathway toward legalizing the country's estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants.

According to a recent study published this week by the Pew Hispanic Center, about 340,000 of the 4.3 million babies born in the U.S. in 2008 - or 8 percent - had at least one undocumented parent.

The study notes 79 percent of the 5.1 million children born to undocumented parents in the U.S. were born here, making them citizens.

Based on March 2009 census figures, children of undocumented immigrants make up 7 percent of all people in the country younger than 18 years old.

About 85 percent of undocumented immigrants are Latino, says the report.

During a Fox News interview last month Republican Senator Lindsey Graham from North Carolina said that many immigrants were crossing the border to have their babies in order to gain citizenship.

"They come here to drop a child," he said.

Texas State Rep. Debbie Riddle, another Republican, said some pregnant women from other countries are traveling to the U.S. to give birth and then taking their babies back home to raise them as terrorists that would return to attack America.

However the Pew figures find that most undocumented mothers did not arrive recently.

More than 80 percent of undocumented mothers had been here for more than a year, and more than half had been in the country for five years or more.

Subhash Kateel, a community organizer with the Florida Immigrant Coalition in Miami told the Orlando Sentinel that immigrant families contribute greatly to society and have grown deep roots in America. Their children are the future nurses, police officers, teachers and engineers, he said.

"They are people who have been here for years and are part of the community," Kateel adds. "The discussion of taking away citizenship is unconstitutional, un-American and flat-out racist."

Sister Ann Kendrick, a Roman Catholic nun with the Hope CommUnity Center in Apopka, Fla., told the Sentinel the debate about immigrants' children being denied citizenship is shocking.

"I don't know of anybody in all my years here who came to just have a baby," she said.

"People come here desperate because they need something better for their family and they want to have a job and they want their kids to go to school and they want good things for their families."

A nationwide survey in June by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, a group affiliated with the Hispanic Center, found that 56 percent of those polled opposed changing the 14th Amendment, while 41 percent supported it.

Meanwhile the Senate passed a $600 million measure Thursday to add Border Patrol agents and equipment to strengthen protection of the U.S.-Mexico border. The House passed the measure earlier in the week. In May President Obama announced plans to deploy 1,200 National Guard troops to the border.

"These votes show that both parties are more interested in political posturing and finger-pointing than in finding real solutions," said Clarissa Martinez De Castro, director of Immigration and National Campaigns with the National Council of La Raza, in a statement.
"Our community is experiencing firsthand the consequences of political demagoguery and congressional inaction, and Latino voters are paying attention," she said.

"The lack of solutions in Washington means that states are pushing ahead with measures that move toward legitimizing the racial profiling of Latinos and others, while allowing politicians to demonize and scapegoat minority communities for their political gain. It's time to put an end to pandering to political extremes and get to the real solutions that American voters want."

Photo: Pepe Lozano

 

 

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • Denying citizenship to babies of illegal immigrants is not racist. The main reason they come out here is to give birth and anchor themselves here hence "anchor babies". The United States is overpopulated! There isn't room in most cities/towns for a nice sized park. Instead we have to take down beautiful areas to make projects/low income housing and then support these people through welfare. I for one feel taxes would go down and our living expenses would be more affordable. There is a difference between a person attempting to gain citizenship and obtain a job legally vs sneaking in and living off of everyone else's hard work. So there is a borderline. I for one am not racist I myself am hispanic. I work full time and have full respect for those that also make a living for themselves. Yet am against those that come here illegally to slack. Just because you are born here does not make you american so I am not sure why this is so hard for people to understand.

    Posted by Liza, 01/05/2011 5:41pm (1 year ago)

  • Does anyone else find offensive the phrase
    "drop a child" ?

    Posted by Ronald Humphrey, 08/17/2010 11:50am (1 year ago)

  • Personally I do not think it is. Just because you feel that way does not mean it is. Can we agree to disagree?

    Posted by poptoy, 08/16/2010 1:17pm (1 year ago)

  • Agreeing with brothers Lozano and Schepers,these efforts are racist and hypocritical but maybe more importantly, un-American,counter-revolutionary and treasonous.
    These studied efforts challenge the inclusive,organizing movement centered,democratic campaigns of La Raza,the NAACP,the AFL-CIO and thousands of nationally and internationally based organizations and individuals who support justice for the pawned and oppressed peoples of the hemisphere.
    It is no mistake that the movement for justice in Arizona identified early on with the movement to expand and make real the guarantees of the 13th,14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution-the modern civil rights movement headed by W.E.B.Du Bois,and Paul Leroy Robeson,and later by Rev.Martin Luther King Jr.,and thousands and thousands of young and old heroes and heroines.
    Brother Schepers has pointed out in an earlier article how this 14th amendment for citizenship, engulfed humanity in an universality,bolstering civil and human rights,including Asians and all native peoples,along with the African element(which science and anthropology has shown had been here a thousand years before Christopher Columbus).
    Make no mistake sisters and brothers,this activity of the Grahams,Boehners,McConnells,coupled with the acquiescence of the Obama administration,to"appease"is an affront to the U.S. Constitution and the evolution of a modern state apparatus,even by capitalist standards.
    Human rights,or "Bill of Rights"capitalism has no chance here,let alone "Bill of Rights"socialism,itself long overdue,as our youth,elderly and environmental ecology suffer under the yoke of imperialism.

    Posted by E.E.W. Clay, 08/14/2010 1:57pm (1 year ago)

  • Fine article, many thanks Pepe. On the other comments, countering the point of this article by saying that other countries, who may have more restrictive policies yet, have to be called "racist" too, is silly. It is of a piece with people who denounce the Manhattan Islamic Center project by pointing out correctly that you can't build Presbyterian churches in Saudi Arabia.

    What policies other countries have is utterly beside the point. We call ourselves a "nation of immigrants" and have a huge statue in the harbor of our largest city which proclaims this to the world. And now we see immigrants being bashed daily.

    By the way, another problem with the proposals to get rid of birthright citizenship is that it would mean that hospitals, or government agents, would have to determine the citizenship of anybody who goes in to have a baby, and maybe their parents and grandparents too. If the parents couldn't prove citizenship or legal status to the satisfaction of the authorities, the kid would not be a citizen. This means that to have a baby and have it be a citizen, you would have a lot of paperwork to do.

    Posted by Emile Schepers, 08/14/2010 11:05am (1 year ago)

  • Whatever, Mr. Pepper. This article is about the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution. I'm sure those other countries have their own racist constituencies that need to be kept in check, too.

    Posted by Mr. Pibb, 08/13/2010 6:59pm (1 year ago)

  • May be. But then you have to call Mexico, France, Germany, Japan, China, Sweden, Switzerland, Austria, Russia,Turkey, UAE racist as well.

    Posted by Mr.Pepper, 08/13/2010 10:49am (1 year ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments